|
|
|
In answer to the all the emails this morning, here’s how I scored last night’s debate between presidential candidates John McCain and Barack Obama: Unfortunately for the many Americans still struggling with making a decision, it was a tie. I thought Obama performed better than McCain on the economic part of the debate and that McCain applied, in the words of an NBC commentator, “an ass-whuppin’” to Obama on foreign policy. The problem for McCain in the first part of the debate, the economic part, is that although he is, quite rightly, crusading for a clean-up of Washington’s financial practices, Obama was able to bring the economic debate to the kitchen table and that, my friends, is where presidential races are decided—through kitchen table economics. We all want Washington’s finances cleaned up, but I don’t think McCain succeeded in laying out exactly how a Washington clean-up will help you and I. It will, most definitely, by cutting government spending and allowing us, as a country, to pay off some of our massive debt. It’s a smart, no nonsense, way to go about cutting back on spending, but I don’t think that McCain succeeded in getting that across. However, please note, neither of these gentlemen was particularly strong in this area. Jim Lehrer had to ask the same question three times—“What will you have to give up [from your plan] as a result of the bailout?”—and still didn’t get a clear answer from either one. But, Obama kept the talk on the Main Street level. Then, came McCain’s undeniable trampling of Obama’s derriere on foreign policy. McCain knows foreign policy probably better than anyone in Washington. He’s seen its history which is extremely important to foreign policy because it is something that is built over decades, not four-year administrations. To make matters worse for Obama, McCain called him out on his Kissinger fib. Kissinger was livid that Obama would claim that he, Kissinger, favored a sit-down with Iran’s Ahmadinejad (and yes, I always have trouble with that name, too). Most of the pundits on CNN, Fox and NBC agreed that there were no sound bites from the evening, but there were. Probably the best was when McCain, regarding Obama’s suggestion that we attack Pakistan, said, in exasperation, “You don’t say that out loud!” It highlighted Obama’s naïveté. Obama, for his own sake, should go ahead and admit that he was wrong about the surge. Otherwise, McCain’s going to keep using it against him. Stay tuned, though, because the tables will be turned on foreign policy next week for the vice presidential debate when Joe Biden will face off against GOP pick Sarah Palin. Biden has a lot of foreign policy experience, unfortunately for the Dems, most of his experience runs the gamut from bad to embarrassingly bad. There is no love lost between Biden and the military, and it would be a smart move for Palin to look at how Biden interacted with Gen. Petraeus in September 2007 and make hay with it. COMMENTS
The only problem with your statement is you did not watch the clip after the debate. It showed Henry Kissinger making that comment. So in truth Both Obama and McCain were technically correct. What makes it an issue is that McCain kept translating "without preconditions" to mean "without preliminary talks conducted by lower level officials. the reality is the best presidents are not cowboys. They do speak to everyone and negotiate with everyone. You will never know how to beat your enemy if you pretend you are a bully in a schoolyard. Republican and Democrat Presidents before Bush have always been open to communication. Now that is more critical than ever.
Hi Ms Ramage, You seem to think Washington CAN be cleaned up! If you do, that must be because you are not aware of how Washington really works or of the warnings issued first by Lincoln and then by Eisenhower who coined the phrase "Military-Industrial Complex”. You also do not seem to be aware that the US spends on the military more than the rest of the world combined. And you have not seen skits such as this one: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI5EY5kqiBU Secondly, that McCain trampled on “Obama’s derriere on foreign policy” may be a correct perception but not reality. In fact, that notion reflects the militaristic attitude in the country of the media as well. Obama did not say it but “preconditions” that McCain and Hillary talk about are in reality ultimatums. When Nixon decided it was time (for reasons connected with the USSR) to normalize relations with China, it is stupid to assume that Kissinger therefore delivered his preconditions to Mao’s China. What happened then was that Nixon changed the US policy and decided it was time to normalize relations with Red China.
It is in the US interest today to normalize relations with all the countries from Venezuela to Iran to Putin’s Russia. Preconditions are just another way of saying we are not ready yet to give up bullying hapless countries such as Cuba, Iran, North Korea and so on. None of these countries are enemies of the US and even if they were, they could not harm America (much less dare to). Teddy Roosevelt (who could never talk softly) said the idea is to talk softly but carry a big stick. The US carries the biggest STICKS of them all. So why ALL this loud talk about preconditions?
So, on Foreign Policy as well as Domestic ones, Obama is by far the better candidate. Not the best, no. Because he has already subscribed to the idea that the US can violate any international law (just like Bush Jr, Reagan, et al) such as violating the sovereignty of any country based on tacit or verbalized “right” of preemption.
Yes, if you are just one more among warmongers, then Obama was ass-whupped. Otherwise not.
Yours, Mike.
Mike would accuse the writer of naivitee and then goes on to say "Iran, North Korea and Putin's Russia can do nothing to harm America".
Bucking for a role on the Obama cabinet as Secretary of State?
Apparently, Obama supporters are as naive as their candidate. According to Mike, Obama is the better candidate on foreign policy; but not the best candidate. Who's the best, then? Nader? You must be logged in to post a comment. You can log in here. |