Advertise Here!
 
Advertisement
Replacement

Current Articles | Categories | Search | Syndication

Forgetting the evils of communism

Alexander Solzhenitsyn is dead. Peter Rodman is dead. And memory is dying with them...


Barack Obama, waves to the crowd in Berlin on July 24 after asking Europe for more troops and funding to fight Al Qaeda
MICHAEL GOTTSCHALK/AFP/Getty Images

By Jonah Goldberg

Alexander Solzhenitsyn is dead. Peter Rodman is dead. And memory is dying with them.

Over the weekend, Solzhenitsyn, the 89-year-old literary titan, and Rodman, the American foreign policy intellectual, passed away. I knew Rodman and liked him very much. A former protege of Henry Kissinger and high-ranking official in two Republican administrations, Rodman was one of the wisest of the wise men of the conservative foreign policy establishment. Calm, elegant, dryly funny, brilliant, but most of all gentlemanly. He died too young, at 64, of leukemia.

Solzhenitsyn was, of course, a landmark of the 20th century, one of the few authors capable of elevating literature to the stuff of world affairs.

What I admired most in both men was their memory. They remembered important things, specifically the evil of communism. And, perhaps nearly as important, they remembered who recognized that evil and who did not.

Rodman, for example, was an architect of the Reagan Doctrine in places such as Angola and Afghanistan. One of his books, "More Precious Than Peace: The Cold War and the Struggle for the Third World," was the quintessential defense of thwarting the Soviets in ugly spots of the globe where Americans were understandably reluctant to spend blood or treasure.

In Berlin on July 24, Barack Obama's history of the Cold War sounded cheerier. There was a lot of unity and "standing as one," and we dropped some candy on Berlin, and now we need to be unified like we were then. But unity was hardly the defining feature of the Cold War. There were supposed allies reluctant to help and official enemies who were eager to do their share. There were Russians—like Solzhenitsyn—who bravely told the world about Soviet barbarity. Here at home, there were a great many Americans, including intellectual heirs to the "useful idiots" Lenin relied on, who rolled their eyes at self-styled "cold warriors" such as Rodman. And from Vietnam through the SANE/Freeze movement, liberal resolve and unity were aimed most passionately against America's policies—not the Soviet Union's.

I think I understand why so many people refused to see the evil in communism: It was well-intentioned. The Soviets were our allies in World War II. Communists spoke of socialism and liberation, and their agents, friends and apologists in the U.S. were comrades in arms with Americans battling racism. But it's worth remembering how evil Communist governments really were. Stalin murdered more people than Hitler. The hammer-and-sickle's stack of bones towers high above the swastika's. "The Black Book of Communism," a scholarly accounting of communism's crimes, counts about 94 million murdered by the supposed champions of the common man (20 million among the Soviets alone), and some say that number is too low.
In 1974, when the New Yorker reviewed Solzhenitsyn's "The Gulag Archipelago," George Steiner wrote: "To infer that the Soviet Terror is as hideous as Hitlerism is not only a brutal oversimplification but a moral indecency." When Ronald Reagan denounced the "evil empire”—because the Soviet Union was evil and it was an empire—he too was accused of absurd oversimplification.

The real brutal oversimplification is the treacle we hear from Obama, that victory in the Cold War was some Hallmark-movie lesson in global hand-holding. The reality is that it was a long slog, and throughout, the champions of "unity" wanted to capitulate to the evil of communism, and the champions of freedom were rewarded with ridicule.

"This is the moment," Obama proclaimed, "when every nation in Europe must have the chance to choose its own tomorrow free from the shadows of yesterday." Rodman and Solzhenitsyn understood that such talk was dangerously naive. People free from the "shadows of yesterday" forget things they swore never to forget. SP

COMMENTS

Commentby Anonymous | Monday, August 11, 2008, 3:34 PM

In his farcical right-wing propaganda piece thinly disguised as pseudo-historical commentary, Jonah Goldberg reveals his usual profound lack of historical understanding via his use of the Past Tense regarding the Cold War. Hurray We Won!

Like it is all over!

Turn on the TV today and Voila! - Russian tanks are a'rollin' along just like old times - through the "Free Republic of Georgia", a U.S. "Ally?"

How quickly do ya'll think the US will throw Georgia under THIS Cold War Bus?

Do you really think the U.S is up for fighting the Russians, having arrogantly labelled ourselves the "World's Only Remaining SuperPower", among other silly self-congratulations, and having patted our grossly obese fastfood gluttoning TV addicted selves on the back for decades now over "How WE WON the Cold War"?

Quoting Goldberg: "...victory in the Cold War WAS... a long slog, and throughout, the champions of "unity" wanted to capitulate to the evil of communism, and the champions of freedom were rewarded with ridicule."

Too late, Russians. We already called ourselves the Winners and we are quite content with that result, so don't rock our self-delusional boat by starting up the war again...please?

Besides, it's OVER. Jonah Goldberg in his infinite wisdom says so.

Oh, and don't forget Jonah's real argument here: that Everyone who disagrees with this storyline is a weak little liberal beee-aaaach ain't worth his/her US citizenship they're such treacherous little hos and stupid too which means you Democrat voters out there.

I paraphrase.

Funny thing is, Jonah, with the Russians resurgent and Russian tanks a'rollin', the proponents of the "unity" strategy of international relationship building - as opposed to the Reaganite's disunity strategy of "provoke the Russians by building more and better nuclear weapons and Star Wars defense systems and hope they back down" - well, let's just say the "unity" folks are suddenly looking like they might have had a better long-term strategy for interacting with other nations around the World, building worthwhile partnerships with them, etc.

I know, ya'll gonna say I'm being naive, right?

Yet, after all the propaganda smoke screens have cleared, it turns out the Russians never went away, never officially stopped contending for their political views with firepower, and still have myriad nuclear weapons, advanced war planes, tanks, troops, etc. Sure, in recent decades they cut out of some of the crummy crappy countries they had run down to the point of uselessness - like Starbucks jettisoning 600 unprofitable stores - but this just made them leaner and, ultimately, maybe even meaner?

In retrospect and in the light of today's invasion, could we really all have believed that the Russians giving up control of such strip-mined societies as Romania and Bulgaria was really "bankrupting" Russia? Hell, it was a series of good business decisions from their perspective, a period of reconsolidation, a time of tightening up the belts and preparing for rebirth, better and more advanced than before.

It is time Americans learned to stop buying the propaganda they are constantly fed by the right wing machine in this country. After all, you can claim the Russians were "defeated" in the Cold War by Reagan "Arms Racing Them Into Bankruptcy", which is the standard propagandist's claim - but isn't it now obvious that the Russians, for a time, simply lost the desire to impose their will on their neighbors by force? The flipside of that argument is that isn't it also obvious that if continuing to occupy those neighbors had been profitable to them, the Russians would have continued to occupy them?

You can think whatever you want, my fellow Americans, you can believe that the Russians were just so scared of Ronald Reagan they bankrupted themselves weapons building and their system just ran out of money and couldn't continue - which is the standard Kool-Aid we've been served by some - but if you take a minute to think, put that Super Sized Burger and fries and high-fructose corn-syrup 80 ounce drink down and THINK about it - since when were Communists known for paying their bills in the first place?

How in the first place, could we ever have "bankrupted" a society which ran on the organizing principle "Do your job whether we choose to pay you or not and be happy about it or we will send you to Siberia or shoot your ass"?

Such a society never ran on our concept of profit and payment in the first place. It ran on the government's will to enforce its wishes at the point of a gun, a will power the Russians believed, for a time, was not serving their interests well enough.

It would seem, however, that they have reconsidered this arrangement and decided to return to some of their "old ways".

Just turn on your TV and see for yourself how the Russians never went away, never surrendered, never thought that much of Ronald Reagan's weapons programs (which did far more to bankrupt our society than theirs, frankly), never thought much of You, or Me, or anything we Americans endlessly praised ourselves into believing was going on in the World.

Turn on the news tonight and you will see for yourself that the Russians never surrendered or claimed an ending to the Cold War.

In fact, in spite of all our collective fantasies about the Russians and their forever demise...They're Baaaaaaaaaaack.

Jonah Goldberg's nonsense can't change this reality.

 

You must be logged in to post a comment. You can log in here.

The Sunday Paper actively moderates site content.
Offensive material will be removed.
However, user comments on display do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Sunday Paper or its staff.

Get what we're talking about
Items we've reviewed in the latest issues of The Sunday Paper, from Amazon.com

 
Advertisement
Depression Studdy
Advertisement
Sharp Residential Banner Block
Advertisement
Dialog in the Dark