Advertise Here!
 
Advertisement
Reproductive Biology

Current Articles | Categories | Search | Syndication

Don’t blame big government

Seven-plus years into the reign of Bush and Cheney, Reagan's anti-government battle cry should be on trial


By Arianna Huffington

Ronald Reagan, in his first inaugural address, famously declared that "government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem." Twenty-seven years later, in the midst of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, and seven-plus years into the reign of Bush and Cheney, Reagan's anti-government battle cry should be on trial. But, stunningly, it is not.

This needs to change. The presidential candidates' view of the role of government should be one of the central questions of the last month of the campaign.

The shift in my own thinking on the role of government was what led to my disillusionment with the Republican Party, and the transformation in my political views. The hope that people would roll up their sleeves and solve this country's social ills without the help of government was never fully realized. There were never enough volunteers or donations -- and the problems were just too massive and intractable to tackle without the raw power of appropriations that only government can provide.

Our economy is not the only thing that is crumbling. So is the philosophical foundation of the modern Republican Party -- also known as the Leave Us Alone Coalition, led by its spiritual guru, Grover Norquist. His dream of making government so small "we can drown it in a bathtub" has been embraced by the GOP mainstream.

Indeed, during his 2003 inauguration, Jeb Bush stood in front of Florida's capitol building and said: "There would be no greater tribute to our maturity as a society than if we can make these buildings around us empty of workers; silent monuments to the time when government played a larger role than it deserved or could adequately fill."

"Big government" didn't get us into Iraq. It didn't spy on Americans or open black-op rendition facilities all over the world. "Big government" didn't create Guantanamo or OK the use of torture. "Big government" didn't leave the residents of New Orleans to suffer in the wake of Katrina. "Big government" didn't cause the financial industry to run off the rails. Indeed, the free market is what created all the new, risky ways for banks to game the system and, eventually, implode, then come calling on "big government" to ride to the rescue. SP

COMMENTS

Commentby Drew | Sunday, October 05, 2008, 8:56 PM

This was substantially more predictable than it was interesting. The piece is also patently heavy on blame- (for Reagan, Bushes, Cheney and the GOP- with the word “congress” not used once) and light (or devoid of?) answers or solutions.

The achilles’ heal of the argument that “this proves the free market doesn’t work and Reagan was wrong” is simple: similar problems around the globe. Even in the EU, where there is no shortage of regulation.

To blame the world’s problems on the effect of contagion from the U.S. won’t fly either. This crises was caused by markets that allowed themselves to mutate into tangled webs of over-complicated instruments. Add to that equation a lack of people with responsibility and accountability who also understand the confusing mess they helped to create. We need qualified managers who are empowered to oversee and enforce.

There are other problems: 1) lack of transparency, 2) a culture of “get it while the gettin’s good”, combined with 3) a lack of foresight and 4) complacency. Looking at the list, I don’t see one problem that calls for Arrianna’s “Big Government”.

Others may point to a lack of socially responsible behavior and greed, instead. Adding layers of bureaucracy aren't the answer to those either. Squelching lobbyists and PACs while educating consumers might be.

Vigorously enforcing the conditions of the "Stabilization Act" (and not being distracted by "sweeteners") while allowing the market to correct itself makes sense. Anyone who doesn't believe that this is a wake-up call for stakeholders, from top to bottom, has been distracted by the demagogery and finger-wagging.

"The hope that people would roll up their sleeves and solve this country's social ills without the help of government was never fully realized" laments Huffinton. But doesn't that leave room for hope?

The political melee that's surrounded this situation strengthens one's resolve that MORE government is not the answer. That may become more apparent after the dust settles.

Expecting a do-nothing congress to legislate us back into shape is wrong. Not every powerful CEO or banker is corrupt AND inept (it's usually one or the other) and front-line employees and consumers share blame and responsibility as well.

We have to vote! For candidates that place substance ahead of rhetoric at the polls and for socially responsible corporate decision-making at the cash register!

Corporate leadership that becomes more dedicated to moral and sustainable, long-term decision making is more likely to prevent a repeat of this than is the addition of more bureaucracy. Jeb Bush is right. We’re just not there yet.  

You must be logged in to post a comment. You can log in here.

The Sunday Paper actively moderates site content.
Offensive material will be removed.
However, user comments on display do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Sunday Paper or its staff.

Get what we're talking about
Items we've reviewed in the latest issues of The Sunday Paper, from Amazon.com

 
Advertisement
Zifty
Advertisement
Sharp Residential Banner Block
Advertisement
Fantastic Finds