Free Classifieds
 

Most Viewed

Top 6 articles this week:

Write In

In order to use this feature, please sign in or register.

Advertisement
Sharp

Current Articles | Categories | Search | Syndication

The Obama effect

Our first black president represents what might have been if slavery never existed in America


Jeannette Wilson, left, and Elizabeth W. Brown at the Martin Luther King Jr. Center.
Stephanie Ramage

“I just felt so proud to be an American.”—Elizabeth W. Brown

“With an Obama administration, disenfranchised whites will need a voice or they will go to white supremacist groups.”—Ellias Fullmore

By Stephanie Ramage

The morning after America elected the nation’s first black president, a steady stream of visitors laid flowers at the tomb of civil rights martyr Martin Luther King Jr. and his wife, Coretta Scott King.

Sunshine bounced off the water that surrounds the tomb, glittered on the camera lenses aimed at it and glinted along the metal spokes of a wheelchair where a black man of about 60 slumped in silence.

When I asked him what had drawn him to the place, he said it was Barack Obama’s election, and then he began his story, without preamble, in the straightforward style of a police report.

“Back in the 1960s, I was one of the first black males to go to an all-white high school down in Jeff Davis County,” he said softly. “I was kicked by three white males for integrating the school.”

Twenty years later, he had become an officer for the Atlanta Police Department. While transporting some juveniles, two bullets ripped into his back and put him in a wheelchair for the rest of his life. The 15-year-old who pulled the trigger was a black male. 

The kid was uneducated.

“He was on drugs, with no faith and no love,” Williams said. “There was no one to nurture him. I have forgiven him. This is a day for forgiveness, when you can sort of let it go.”

Around the man’s neck hung a badge that identified him as Richard E. Williams, a police detective for the Atlanta Public Schools. He still works. He took a break to come over to the tomb.

“This election has given us some relief from being made to feel like outcasts,” he explained. “It has shown the world that all we needed was an opportunity for an education. This historic moment has shown what education can do for you. When you look at Obama, you can see that. So I had to come here and thank Martin and Coretta for sacrificing their lives for us so that we could see this day.”

Williams’ brother, who still lives in the south Georgia county that bears the name of the president of the Confederacy, called him at 5 a.m. to tell him that now he believes it really is possible for a black man to be president of the United States.

Tears pooled in deep creases beneath Williams’ eyes as he recounted the conversation. Taking a breath like someone coming up for air, he said, “In the end, there is joy.”

White lies for black children

A little farther along the broad lip of the fountain where the tomb stands, two women sat talking with a handmade poster resting against their knees. The words “Barack Obama, 44th President, A Dream Becomes Reality” were scrawled around a photo of the president-elect.

“I didn’t even have words to say,” said Elizabeth W. Brown, recalling the election results. “It was breathtaking. I just felt so proud to be an American.”

Brown was born and raised in Birmingham, Ala. One Sunday morning in September 1963, a friend named Carole Robertson invited her to services at the 16th Street Baptist Church.

“I had a cold, so I didn’t go,” Brown said. “Otherwise, I would have been there.”

Later that morning, a bomb set by Ku Klux Klansmen detonated, blowing up part of the church and killing four girls, one of whom was Brown’s friend, Carole Robertson.

Brown went on to attend Spelman College here in Atlanta, and it was while a student there in 1968 that she got the news that Martin Luther King Jr. had been assassinated.

“That was 40 years ago,” she said. “I keep thinking of the biblical significance of that, of how the Israelites wandered in the desert for 40 years and here we are, today. There is still a lot to do, but I hope that this becomes a turning point in the lives of our people, in the lives of Americans. I hope that things will be better for all of us.”

Sitting next to Brown was Atlanta native Jeannette Wilson, who made the poster. The two had only just met. They both felt drawn to the tomb and, once there, found others, like themselves, who wanted to pay their respects to a moment in history that felt almost like a dream.

Wilson said she feels no bitterness toward Obama’s Republican opponent, Sen. John McCain, or his supporters. (I didn’t tell her, as anyone who has read my columns knows, that I am one of them.) She and Brown agreed that they were not raised to hate or resent.

In fact, Wilson explained, her parents were so desperate to protect her from knowing how they were viewed by white people that they lied to her. They told her that segregated water fountains were out of order or had some other problem so that she wouldn’t try to drink from them.

 “It was the same if we needed to use the bathroom,” she said. “My mother would come up with some story, because she didn’t want us to know that there were rules against people our color using certain water fountains or restrooms.”

This elaborate ruse was carried out until Wilson was old enough to see for herself that the world was not a place of tainted water fountains and faulty restrooms, but was instead a place of tainted hearts and faulty thinking.

Black America without a history of slavery

Standing close by, a young black man with braids pulled back from his face listened to their stories.

His name is Ellias Fullmore. He’s 30 years old, a graduate of Morehouse College. His mother is Ethiopian and his father, now an executive, was a Black Panther. Because of his parents, he is well aware of the difference in how Africans and African-Americans are viewed and, as Elizabeth Brown pointed out earlier, Obama “is a real African American.”

That is to say, Obama is not descended from slaves. In that way, our 44th president differs from everyone I interviewed for this story, and the vast majority of blacks in America.

“People tend to be more comfortable with Africans than with African-Americans,” Fullmore said. Why are the two groups so different? For the same reason that African-Americans are different from any other group: They suffered something that no one else on earth has—centuries-long, government-sponsored, brutally enforced slavery in the modern era which, though outlawed, cast a long shadow well into the 20th century.

In Fullmore’s opinion, expecting blacks to feel as though they’ve achieved equality just because there’s a black man in the White House is like expecting someone crippled in a car crash to walk out of the hospital and immediately go back to life as usual.

“The bones are still broken,” he said. “You have to remember that African-Americans have been here just as long, and in many cases longer, than most other Americans. Other groups came here with little or nothing, but that’s different from having no choice about coming here. If you choose to get to a place, you’re willing to do what it takes to make it once you’re there. But if you’re there against your will, how will you perform?”

     What other group, he asked, had to endure having the strongest among them taken and beaten, tarred and feathered, and tied to horses and pulled apart as an example to the others?

“When the other African men saw that, they cried like little girls,” he said. “What other group endured children being taken from their mothers? Fathers being torn from their families? Even our last names are cattle brands—they don’t tell you who we are, they tell you who we belonged to.”

Obama’s name belongs to Obama. Although he is not descended from slaves, he grew up black in America, so he has lived the more recent African-American experience. Yet Obama also represents what might have been if slavery never existed in America. He is the embodiment of black America without the horror of its enslaved past. So where does that leave African-Americans and the burden of their history?

“I grew up after segregation and now, I think that we are at the place where we can realize that the point was never people, it was ideas, and now, the point is these kids,” Fullmore said, gesturing to a few youngsters nearby. “A whole generation of black kids needs to grow up without questioning their possibilities.” 

Fullmore said he was struck by that idea while volunteering for the Obama campaign in Virginia. After a campaign event, some of the volunteers got together for a wine and cheese party.

“There we were, 80-year-old white people, young black people, Asians, all of us together having wine and cheese, and I thought, ‘this is the way it should be,’” he said.
 
The problem has been, to no small extent, a set of well-worn myths, he said, and then rifled through a few of them. For example, blacks make up only about 12 percent of the American population, yet are routinely blamed for sapping the resources of entitlement and welfare programs.

“If every single one of us were on welfare, we still would not make up the majority of welfare recipients,” Fullmore said. “The same is true with the prison population. A lot has been made of how many blacks are in prison, but since we’re only 12 percent of the population, then obviously most people in prison are not black.”

In a country that is 75 percent white, the black presence has been overblown, sometimes to the detriment of blacks. To illustrate this, Fullmore pointed out that he doesn’t support affirmative action programs because they actually benefit white women more than blacks.

“Look, how many blacks do you think they have in Idaho?” he asked. “When they need an affirmative action hire in most parts of the country, they’re not hiring blacks.”

There were too few blacks to get a black president elected. Obama was elected because of white votes.

Obama’s presidency, said Fullmore, will mean changes that no one talked about during the campaign—like reaching out to a group of people who have a harder time of it than blacks.

“Dirt-poor white trash,” he said. “If you’re a poor white person, you don’t even exist. Poor white people are invisible even to whites. If you’re a poor black person, you can use that black kinship to get some help from other blacks. Whites don’t have that. With an Obama administration, disenfranchised whites will need a voice, or they will go to white supremacist groups.” SP

Mr. Fullmore states, " If you’re a poor black person, you can use that black kinship to get some help from other blacks. Whites don’t have that." In other words, blacks are only willing to help blacks. And he further states that "poor white trash" will have to turn to white supremacist groups for help. Is the KKK a charity?

samJ
Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 11:50 AM



I appreciate the tone and tenor of this piece and see the need to discuss what Pres. Obama means to race relations in this country.

Nonetheless, I would have omitted some of the more radical Fullmore commentary. This African-American sometimes speaks as though he is only one generation removed from being a black panther; because he is.

Yes, many Americans are proud of America. (I'm one of them; though it's not my first time).

Yes, the fact that Pres. Elect Obama is a "true African-American" and not a descendent of slaves is a worthwhile observation.

Yes, some "poor white trash" will turn to the KKK. (not for bread and beans, Sam. They feel "disenfranchised". Look it up.)

Yes, Barack Obama's campaign did remove racial barriers for a diverse cast of people to step up, become involved and join together to meet a common objective. Yes, that's the BEST OF AMERICA.

However, we are at a critical point in the evolution of race relations in this country. We should be careful as to the aspects of the issue of race that we chose to debate.

Giving Fullmore a voice and legs to certtain devisive positions is simply not healthy or productive. Take terms such as "poor white trash", for example.

Reparations, for example, might not be the type of issue that will bring people together. Revisiting OJ Simpson or Rodney King right now, not a great idea.

Other issues are more abstract but equally objectionable. Fullmore doesn't support affirmative action because it benefits more white women than blacks.

It's not because affirmative action sends the wrong message to minorities, it's because it benefits some other minorities other than his own.

Shouldn't this be a time when minorities come together... with other minorities and with, dare I say it, EVERY AMERICAN?

Let's seize the moment. Let's sharpen our focus. Let's bend our ear to those with productive things to contribute and lets not be set back by those who prefer to stand on old, corrosive arguments.

The fact that Fullmore is likely to not fully accept Barack as "one of his own" because of some differences that go back generations, is symbolic of how deep rooted racism is in a number of communities that consider themselves "the oppressed".

Isn't Pres. Elect Obama as much a white man as he is a black? Does skin pigmentation somehow trump heritage?

What was that Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King said about "judge not a man by the color of his skin but by the content of his character".

Some will dust off certain quotes and platitudes only when it is convenient. For now, let's be respectful and thoughful and "seize the day".

Drew
Tuesday, November 11, 2008 at 2:03 PM


Using the reference "poor white trash" isn't respectful.

Shrill
Wednesday, November 12, 2008 at 2:10 PM


Wow ...I feel like I was taken out of context and misquoted. Ms Ramage and I sat for nearly 30 min and had what I thought was a pleasent conversation. She seemed like a genuine person so I am reluctant to question her motives.

In regards to the "poor white trash" comment I was quoting a European American friend of mine who rejected the term "white" because he associated the term with the socio-political power structure that he was not apart of because he grew up very poor. He was called "white trash " by "white" people , so he self identified as white trash . Ms Ramage made it seem like I was calling poor white people "trash" and i was not.
What I did tell her was as a black person who grew up upper middle class in a small Indiana town and despite a few anoying encounters with racism ...that racism didn't "keep me down" . I told ms Ramage how I understood that my "white trash" frie nd was more " opressed" than I was. I told Ramage that the issue is about enfranchised and the disenfranchised not race. I told her that I was a member of an online white supremist group for 2 years just so i could understand racism. I told her how I ironicly I coud understand why they are scared. I told her that people should reach out to disenfranchised whites as well as all disenfranchised people particularly now that we have a black president. There are a lot of scared whites folks out there. I told Ramage about my Ethiopian mother and ex-panther turned executive father to illustrate that I grew up with a strong sense of who I was and understood a multiplicity of black experiences.
And finaly about the afirmative action thing ...I did not say I was against affiatiion "because" it helps white women more the blacks...I told her that I was conservative in many respect.. I would rather see people get help based on need. After she very candidly admited that she finds her self questioning the merit of black affirmtive action hires ....I reminded her most affirmitive action hires where like her ...a white woman...but they don't have the stigma of their ability coming into question.

if you ever get interviewed by Ms Ramage ask for a copy before it goes to print


Anonymous
Wednesday, November 12, 2008 at 3:20 PM


Assuming Anonymous = Fuller, I'd be less dismayed by Ramage's treatment of the info you offered during your interview. Based on what's written and what you divulge transpired during the actual sit down, many writers would've taken a more sensational approach.

I respect Fuller's point-of-view and conservative sensibilities. Too much is made of the "poor white trash comment". I'm a generation removed from "poor white trash" and welcome this discussion.

I'd be interested in hearing his thoughts on handling discussions on race relations moving forward. For the sake of keeping the debate positive and productive, how selective should we be as to which nuances of the issue we explore?

In my view, there are horses that have been beat to death: debates that offer no positive resolution and should be left alone. Some wounds won't heal if you keep picking at them.

I'm also curious to know 1) how a drop of black blood in a "mixed" man or woman makes them "black" and 2) how will Pres. Obama be treated by most southern blacks (candidly) as a "true african-american" (vs. "african-americans descended from slaves")

Drew
Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 10:23 AM


I don't care about names and labels. However, there is nothing positive about "poor white trash" and if we are going to promote unity, we need to be less devisive. Do you think Mr. Obama would use that terminology? I think we need to bury "poor white trash" LOL !

Shrill
Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 11:34 AM


I think we need to have more open conversations about race and stop being so damn pc. Most Black people , most White people , most Native Americans and various imigrant groups have very different versions of what America is . It is nieve to assume otherwise and it is barbaric to think one people's story is more valid then another. But so far the story of America has only been told primarily from one point of view. think about a story like goldy locks....because we have been told one side of the story ...we identify with her and not the bears. We seldom if ever consider her as breaking and entering ...we identify with her hunger and not her thievery.

The view of American founding fathers as heroes and enlightened defenders of freedom is matched by another story of genocidal white supremist hypocrites. Washington, Jackson, Jefferson live on as the last names of the decendents of their "property". Why is my lastname german ? It's not either or....America is both.
So an honest conversation should start with trying to integrate many stories into one story. That may mean radicaly changing our way of looking at what America even is. Let's accept that slavery is not ancient history. ...if you are an 80+ year old black person who knew your grandparents ...then YOU KNEW A SLAVE personaly. So for many people this issue is very personal not some abstract issue. The poetic irony of a black man in the white house that was litteraly built by slaves in a city who,s layout was redrawn by memory by a black man (benjermin banaker) in the same majority black DC that
has an African obelisk as a monument George Washington ...will be lost on some
For others that what makes this so cool. But a black president will not fix things ....things will be "fixed" when nobody cares what color the president is. We might need like 3 more before people get over it.

Lastly as a person who is half Ethiopian I think it important that black people identify more with Africa
And by identifying with his Blackness they are identifying with blackness that transends slavery and aligns us with a larger international black community. I also think it's important that Obama is half white .. because not only is he symbolic of racial reconcilation it allowed white people to see them selves in a black man.

How can he be equal parts black and white and stll be black? I would like to hear white folks adress this . White identity seems to be based on purity and black identity is based on experience . I think white people kinda need racism to exist. Otherwise wouldn't they eventualy fade out? 2050 whites will be a minority. Do you think they are mentaly prepared?


Anonymous
Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 2:29 PM


Assuming Anonymous = Fuller, I'm disappointed. I'm with you when it comes to kicking "PC" to the curb, but I want a constructive debate on the issue.

When you say things like "whites need racism" and imply that we need to revisit the hero-worship of our founding fathers, when you remind us of how recent slavery was, as if that's somehow more relevant than how far we've come in a short time, then you push the debate into a "hot zone" where nothing positive happens.

The idea of finding a "common story for all of us" should not be that difficult. My ancesters picked cotton and tobaco, and lived under oppressive regimes.

My people struggled to keep from watching their children starve and couldn't prevent their families from being torn asunder by ailing economies and war.

There's much that binds us together and really little that separates us, if we look forward and imagine a positive future.

If, on the other hand, we continue down the road of using racism as an excuse and playing the blame game, the debate will drive a bigger wedge.

If we can't find a way to have a constructive dialog, we should all just keep quiet. That doesn't mean "adhere to PC", that means "have respect and empathy".

Drew
Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 4:49 PM


Well said, Drew. A focus on unity and discussions on how to achieve it; fodder for progress. I remember a VERY short lived unity that occurred on September 12th, 2001. Unfortunately, tragedies serve to either unite or divide us. I pray for NO tragedies, but unity through a common enemy . . . division. It seems too simple. As simple as "love your neighbor as yourself." If we could only truly do that. . .

Shrill
Thursday, November 13, 2008 at 5:24 PM


Anonymous/Ellias,

I did not misquote you, Ellias. Yes, we did have a pleasant conversation and I thought you a very intelligent young man, as have many of the paper's readers since they read your comments. I never said that you said all whites were trash. How could you interpret that from reading the story?

You said, and I quoted you as saying, that it will be important to reach out to 'poor white trash' to prevent them from going over to white supremacist groups. You defined what you meant in the previous paragraph by 'poor white trash'--poor whites who are so disenfranchised that they are invisible to other whites. We all think of them as poor white trash, just as your own friend referred to himself in this manner. We can put aside the politically correct posturing, we all know what we mean by 'poor white trash' and your critics' indignant hysteria is pretentious.

But don't try to cover yourself by saying I misquoted you. I don't "clean up" the quotes of my interviewees, as some writers do, to make them more palatable. I believe in being honest and not trying to cosmetically enhance things just so we can all get along.

You said what you said and you may not like the way people are responding to it, but that doesn't change the fact that you said it, and just so you know, it doesn't change the fact that you were right to say it. As you told me, it is time that we as a nation had a candid conversation about race.

You did say some things that didn't make it into the story, but I couldn't devote the entire story to you. We only have so much space in the paper and there were older folks there who contributed to the background and history of the day's importance.

I tried to reach you before the story was published and even afterward, but you did not return my calls. You also have my card, so if you had any concerns you could have addressed them directly with me in the several days that passed after the story was on the racks--but you didn't say anything until other people responded to the story. When no one was commenting, I didn't hear from you. (In fact, you still haven't contacted me; if you felt we had a pleasant conversation, why don't you feel comfortable with calling or emailing me directly and talking about it?) It wasn't until after you saw how people reacted to your comments--which, by the way, I don't see as being particularly radical--that you began claiming that I misquoted you. I didn't.

-- Best wishes, Stephanie Ramage


Stephanie Ramage
Saturday, November 15, 2008 at 10:56 AM


You must be logged in to post a comment. You can log in here.

The Sunday Paper actively moderates site content.
Offensive material will be removed.
However, user comments on display do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Sunday Paper or its staff.

 
Advertisement
Zifty
Advertisement
Sharp Residential Banner Block
 
RSSTwitterFacebookMySpaceVirb